April 10,
2024 by HFBusiness Staff in Business Strategy, Industry 
With economic conditions and consumer confidence outside the industry’s control, manufacturers continue to raise the bar by designing products that generate their own demand. From innovative materials to classic design revivals, here’s a look at what’s selling best in the dining category.
The sustainability story resonates for customers of Greenington Fine Bamboo Furniture, according to Troy Lerew, vice president of sales. “Our Azara dining room collection is a proven success story for our dealers and a perfect example of how we can create beautiful and high-quality furniture using one of the earth’s most sustainable resources, bamboo.” Greenington’s caramelized and exotic tiger finishes are not surface stains, they’re colors resulting from the company’s innovative production processes using only heat, steam and pressure. The result is a selection of natural, solid bamboo tones that are environmentally safe and feature a beautiful grain pattern with continuous color throughout the material.
At Stickley, classic Mid-century modern styling continues its decades-long popularity, as demonstrated by the success of its Walnut Grove collection, explains Aminy I. Audi, CEO and chair of the board at L. & J.G. Stickley. “The broad appeal of its stunning mid-century modern style is undeniable, as our customers continue to remind us.” Mid-century modern looks resonate at Simpli Home as well. “Shoppers appreciate the Malden Bentwood dining chair for its simple elegance and versatility,” says Darcy McGilvery, chief marketing officer of Simpli Home. “Its sleek midcentury design fits seamlessly in dining rooms, kitchens, offices, or sitting areas.” Quick shipping times and solid-wood construction are key success factors at Fusion Designs.
Durable materials and design innovation are driving Bellini Modern Living’s best-sellers. “Consumers are gravitating to Italian ceramic dining tables because they are so durable and highly resistant to scratches and stains,” says Hossein Azimi, chief executive officer of Bellini Modern Living. “But the real beauty of this table is in the return-on-investment retailers enjoy per square foot.”
The return of round dining tables is also notable. “Coaster’s trending sellers in the dining category are large round tables,” says Crystal Nguyen, vice president of merchandising and product strategic planning of Coaster Fine Furniture. “There’s a noticeable trend resurgence in round dining tables, striking the perfect balance of style and affordability. These tables are designed to support the return of family gatherings and face-toface conversations."
April 10,
2024 by HFBusiness Staff in Business Strategy, Industry
Since the end of 2019 when the economic chaos began, furniture industry sales grew 39.7% in current dollars, but only 16.9% in real dollars (Table B).
During this period, external factors were impacting the furniture industry including increasing disposable income, worker shortages, and growing wages and salaries. During 2020 and 2021, the consumers’ newly renewed interest in their homes, aided by government stimulus money, kept furniture sales growth ahead of both disposable income and wages and salaries increases. Especially in 2021, inflation-adjusted industry growth of 12.7% outpaced the real growth in personal disposable income of 3.1% and wages and salaries in real dollars of 4.1%. (Figure 1). But by the end of last year real growth for furniture had fallen to 1.2% compared to 4.2% increases for disposable income and 2% growth for wages. The consumers put their wallets back in their pockets when it came to furniture.
The worker shortage featured frequently in news, jumps out at you in Table C. Between 2019 and 2023 wages and salaries increased 26.2% in current dollars (19.2% inflation adjusted-real dollars) while the number of employed workers grew only 2.2.%.
Population growth took a hit during 2020 and especially 2021 when the pandemic was at its worst. While the country continued to grow, it slowed to only 0.17% increase in 2021, the first time since 1937 that the population grew by less than one million people (Figure 2).
Markets Respond to Economic Upheaval
The nationwide picture of industry sales growth between 2019 and 2023 varied by state and especially by market type, whether metropolitan statistical area (MSA), micropolitan statistical area (Micro SA) or rural communities. Figure 3 gives a detailed overview of industry sales and growth by these market types. Between 2019 and 2023, the industry grew to $150.19 billion dollars, an increase of $42.67 billion dollars over the four years. Over 91% of that growth occurred in MSAs, the best performing markets. MSAs grew 39.9% in sales during the period, while micro statistical areas trailed increasing 37.4% and rural areas designated in 46 states by 36.7%.
The 404 U.S. MSAs control 91.2% of industry sales, a higher percentage than their share of personal income (89.4%) or employed workers (87.6%). Part of this can be explained by consumers living in smaller micropolitan and rural areas travelling to larger markets to shop for furniture, either online or in person. As smaller Mom and Pop furniture stores have closed over the years in smaller areas, local choices have steadily disappeared (Table D).
The cumulative growth in furniture industry sales, personal income, and employment by market type between 2019 and 2023 is further detailed in Figure 4. Of special note is that while employment grew 2% during the fouryear period, that growth occurred in MSAs while Micro SAs and rural areas lost workers. Personal income, however, grew slightly more in Micro SAs and rural areas than MSAs – 18.9% in MSAs compared to 19.5% in Micro SAs and 19.9% in rural areas.
Size of Market Matters in the Furniture Industry
Of the 404 MSAs scattered across the U.S., over 20% of industry sales occur in nine mega markets that each have over $2 billion in industry sales annually. These nine mega markets (names shorted here) are listed largest to smallest: New York (NY-NJ), Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, Dallas, Washington (DC-VA-MD-WV), Phoenix and Seattle. The largest market, New York totaled $5.59 billion in industry sales last year, and the smallest Seattle, $2.13 billion. Behind these nine markets are 32 MSAs with industry sales between $1 billion and $2 billion annually, that control 29.5% of the industry. Table E shows the percentages and Figure 5 the complete detail of sales and growth of all market sales ranges.
The best performing segments of MSAs during 2019 to 2023 as a group were the second tier MSAs with annual sales of $1 billion to $2 billion. These markets as a group grew 41.1% over the four years, but when adjusted for inflation grew 18.1%. Table F shows the current and real growth of all market sales ranges.
The detail in Figure 5 consolidates the performance statistics of the MSA sales ranges. The external factors impacting the MSA sales range segments between 2019 to 2022/2023 are shown in Figure 6. Of note is that the second-tier markets with $1 billion to $2 billion dollar industry sales had the highest growth in personal income at 21%, compared the largest markets with 16.4% increase. These second tier $1 to $2 billion dollar markets also had the highest percentage growth in employed workers at 3.3%. Looking at population growth, it is interesting to note that smaller markets with $250 million to $499 million had a much higher percent growth in population at 3.1%. Meanwhile, the mega markets over $2 billion posted the lowest growth at 1.1%. Many residents of these mega markets fled to smaller areas due to Covid, remote working opportunities, and social problems within their city cores. Figure 7 features the three top and bottom performing MSAs within each of the seven MSA industry sales ranges. Also noted on these markets are indicators if they were also in the top (T) or bottom (B) three in growth last year in external factors within their MSA. External factors are population, and jobs growth. This illustrates how external factors and industry sales go hand in hand.
January 27,
2024 by HFBusiness Staff in Business Strategy, Industry
Let’s explore the four “P’s” of merchandising with the first being PERSISTANCE. That is what it will take as the merchandising team balances short term profitability with long term BRAND that is the percentage of consumers in your market that will consider you when they started the shopping process. The table below present 2023 results by distribution channel.
Over half (53.9%) of consumers did not consider independent retailers while shopping but 46.1% did. 16.2% of consumers considered shopping at independents but didn’t follow through. and 16% shopped but did not purchase. Thankfully 13.9% did. Compare the many competing distribution channels – more on this in the next issue of Home Furnishing Business. What does this mean to the merchandising team? EVERYTHING. Merchandising influences all the factors that drive success – driving the consumer to consider to shop and to purchase.
This article is focused on the traditional furniture sector including both manufacturers and retailers. However, we realize that some traditional manufacturers and retailers are exploring other strategies as as illustrated in Figure 1.
Industries are always in a state of transition. With furniture manufacturing centers shifting from Jamestown, New York to Grand Rapids, Michigan to Western North Carolina. Likewise, distribution channels move from department stores and national chains to independents and regional chains to retail verticals and e-tailers. (Table B) But returning to the traditional channels, what can reverse the downward trend?
In the last 30 years we have seen the second generation expand the family’s single store/single market business to multi-markets, with many stores becoming corporations. Unfortunately, several have moved on to venture capital or public ownership with mixed results.
While the Commerce Department still recognizes over 20,000 furniture stores and home furnishing stores as shown in Tables C and D, the majority of the TRADITIONAL RETAILERS revenue is generated by the top 300 retailers (20.9%) of the TOTAL industry.
After the significant increase in revenue enjoyed by independent retailers, which created a financial windfall during the pandemic, many independent retailers are closing. The main reason for exiting is the lack of a family transition plan. PRODUCT – “THE FOUNDATION OF RETAIL“ There is much confusion about the definition of furniture store and home furnishing store. Here is the official definition from the Commerce Department:
Well, that didn’t help much. However, it does give some guidance to the revenue statistics shown in Table E. For traditional furniture retailers currently, the products would be defined as shown in Table F. It is interesting to note the merchandise line-up difference between the total industry and the larger stores as well as the change from 2017 to 2023.
If we went further back, we would see that other product categories have disappeared from the traditional furniture stores – small appliances, linen, dinnerware and so forth. Why? The most common response is competition from discounters. It is true that the “category killers” become part of the retail scene and drove many products from furniture retail stores. Recently these same “category killers” have met their demise, Babies R Us and Bed Bath and Beyond, to name a few. Today, the category killer is the INTERNET with the focus on the rug, accessory and bedding category, and yes furniture in 2023 with 18% of furniture sold on the Internet according to FurnitureCore, sister company to Home Furnishings Business and its research arm.
Today, there is much discussion about store traffic or lack of such. If we are limiting the reasons for shopping to items that are only purchased every two or three years, what is the impact? Even with a loyal customer base the time between purchases is significant. Consider Table G with 25%± of purchases beyond seven quarters. We should consider the RETAIL VERTICAL distribution channel that now provides 28.2% of all furniture sold. New entities such as Arhaus have 16,000 sq. ft. stores selling on average $10M per store by merchandising the total home. Difficult to execute, but so is a GOB. Harsh? But true. The industry’s emerging customers, the millennials and Gen Z, want more than just a sofa. Shop a Home Goods store and see the “lookers.” Wouldn’t you like that traffic in your store? Maybe they would discover that sofa that they couldn’t live without.
It may be time to take our product categories back. Should we reconsider infant furniture? PRICE POINTS – WHAT WE CAN AFFORD OR WHAT WE WANT? It took a pandemic to allow the furniture industry to attain a price increase. For decades the industry has bemoaned the fact that in 1964 a new Mustang cost $3500 and a sofa was $300 and now a Mustang is 15x that and the industry is still selling $399 sofas. The Consumer Indexes graphic (Graphic 1) illustrates.
Yes, the industry got a bounce, but so did the automotive industry. The price increase obviously accelerated industry growth after the initial shock of the pandemic store closures as can be seen from Graphic 2.
Where this situation resulted in a price increase driven by increased transportation cost, material cost and yes, an increase in gross margin at retail. Gross margin per square foot of selling space accelerated from the $6/sq ft level to the $10/sq ft level in 2021 peaking in 2022 at $12/sq ft before beginning to stabilize at $10/sq ft in 2023 as seen in Graphic 3.
Obviously, this was an increase in revenue but not units sold. However, the pandemic did cause a shift in traditional retailers’ merchandising price points measured by units sold by price point. Using upholstery/ stationary/sofa-love/fabric as a datum, the % of units sold in promotional drop from 24.2% in 2019 to 8% in 2023. This shift caused a 45% increase in average unit selling price of stationary-fabric sofas ($704 --$1027). Graphic 4 presents the comparison.
There is a reason that the furniture industry has been able to continue in existence without any significant price increases – the most frequent answer is the transition to offshore manufacturing. Yes, there was a cost savings after factoring in transportation cost. Now imports represent 26.9% of all furniture sold in the United States. The pandemic disruption caused a reconsideration of the offshore model. However, the many barriers of reshoring are significant. However, the major reason is the gradual reduction in quality. We say gradual because the consumer has a general perception of quality decline but not specific. How or why did the industry pursue this strategy? Gradually the marketing of furniture moved away from quality statements such as “EIGHT WAY HAND TIED” and discussion of wood species – “pecan/cherry/solid oak” to mixed hardwood or construction of “dovetailed drawers.” To illustrate the 2018 consumer awareness of eight way handtied at “did not know” at 41% in 2013 declining to 64% in 2017 and probably nil now. The results are the consumer not being educated about quality differences to justify the price differential. There is a difference between a $399 sofa and a $999 sofa, but does the consumer know or for that matter, does the retail sales associate know? The results are consumer’s purchase without a quality differential. The influence of the consumers income has little impact on the purchase. In fact, currently, in 2023 if the consumer’s household income is $100K - $150K, the probability of purchasing a $400 - $999 sofa is 1.7x compared to 2.1x for purchasing a $1000 - $2000. Graphic 5 presents the percentages.
The retailer’s communication of price/value is critical in the selling process. How important, on a scale of 1-5 of importance? PRICE/VALUE as would be expected ranks 4.55 no matter the age or income. As can be seen from Table H. The distribution channel that delivers the best price/value by far is regional chains as can be seen in Graphic 6.
But concern should be noted about the consumer’s perspective of mass merchants, Internet compared to the independents.
SELECTION - FOUND WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR
The concept of selection has emerged as a focus. The question is HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH? No matter the breadth of selection it is important with all ages and incomes. From consumer surveys in 2023 it was the number two behind price/value. (See Table I) While many retailers still have 100,000+ square foot stores, using a destination store strategy, in the last decade others have reduced their store footprint and moved the stores closer to the time starved consumer. The results have been an increase in occupancy cost offset by a reduction in advertising expense reflecting the retailer’s presence in a retail shopping area. Currently (2023) for traditional retailers, the performance is averaging $204/square foot (annual). Graphic 7 presents the monthly statistics.
This performance measure has increased since 2019 due to the average unit selling price the performing values between smaller independents ($145/sq ft) the larger regional chains ($275/sq ft).
The question is —store size versus consumer’s drive distance. The retail/ manufacturing verticals have more stores per household in the market but smaller stores (15M – 35M). However, the stores perform. Consider Arhaus store at 16,000 sq ft on average producing $625 per square foot, a statistic that makes traditional retailer’s question – how can they provide enough selection in that small footprint? The answer is simple. Arhaus focuses on a smaller segment of consumers (29%) than the typical regional chain serving 77% of the households in the market.
The major challenge in merchandising is the generation shift as the Baby Boomer exits and the next two generations become our prime customers. In fact, it has already occurred in 2020 when Generation X surpassed the Baby Boomers. (Graphic 8). With each generation comes a demand for a new style. In a recent survey, we compared from the consumer’s PERSPECTIVE their current style to their dream style. The results are shown in Table J.
While this is a significant challenge for the merchandise team, the extent of the challenge is to compare the dream styles of the Millennials to the Baby Boomers as shown in Graphic 10. Obviously, from the graphics above, retailers must get MODERN and INDUSTRIAL ready for the Millennials. The challenging merchandising question is, what is the definition of style from the consumer’s perception? Remember, it is in the eye of the beholder. Style quizzes have been overused and abused as website interceptors. However, those that are based upon research can help refine YOUR definition of style. Using your buyers’ perception of style as the product is placed in the merchandise lineup, survey your target consumer. When you present your style interpretation and they concur, the process of style refinement begins. (Graphic 11).
The ultimate measure is what sells. In most retailers, a “war room” exists displaying best sellers. A digital version of best sellers for upholstery/ stationary/sofa-line/fabric. (Graphic 12). Note that only one of the SKUs that are best sellers for Millennials are in the Top 5.
PARTNERSHIP - A REAL SHARING OF OBJECTIVES
What is required to reverse this downward trend? -- Simply put, PARTNERSHIP. A return to sharing between manufacturer and retailers, specifically.
The industry is undergoing a generational shift. This shift from the Baby Boomers that fueled the transition from department store and national chains to independent furniture stores has been unstable for the past decade with Generation X now generating 36.7% of the industry revenue and their children, the Millennials, following close behind. (Table K)
The feature article in the Nov/Dec 2023 issue of Home Furnishing Business addressed the consumer. Now we will address the most critical component, the product, and how retailers and manufacturers can address the merchandising task.
It has been a long time since the term “product maven” and “merchant” have been used to refer to furniture leaders. The truth is, it was never the individual that produces the magic, but a team that includes the manufacturer, retailers and the sales representative. For traditional manufacturers and retailers to reverse this trend requires getting the team back together. So, now let’s begin the process of sharing to create improved performance for both manufacturer and retailer. Just follow the red arrows below.
January 27,
2024 by HFBusiness Staff in Business Strategy, Industry
The opportunity to tie mattress sales to health benefits is top-of-mind for today’s mattress manufacturers and suppliers. From new yarns and fibers to innovative adjustable bases, product features are being developed and marketed to entice consumers with health benefits. At Therapedic, these advancements are in the form of copper yarns and copper-powered fabrics proven to be absorbable by the skin for wellness benefits. “Our Immunity collection contains the highest copper content of any mattress made for consumers; it consists of copper woven into the fabric cover and infused in the mattress foam,” says CEO and president Gerry Borreggine. “Research shows that copper is anti-bacterial, anti-microbial, reduces inflammation, and may increase circulation, all benefits that appeal to consumers.”
At top price points, luxury models continue to benefit from this wellnessdriven market dynamic. “The consumer’s quest for a healthier sleep experience elevates the importance of the luxury mattress segment,” says Bill Hammer, president of Shifman Mattresses.
For Norway-based Stressless, its newest model—Sky—reflects decades of product knowledge and innovation. “At Ekornes we are not new to the mattress category,” says Peter Bjerregaard, president. We’ve been producing mattresses since 1937 and have a deep understanding of the factors that account for good sleep, and why it is essential for a healthy life. We have combined our extensive sleep insights with the Nordic lifestyle, which promotes good health in harmony with nature, to create the Stressless Sky.”
According to industry research and estimates from the FurnitureCore model developed by Impact Consulting Services, parent company to Home Furnishings Business magazine—sales in the bedding category declined in 2022. At year end, 2022 finished at $17.8 billion compared to $18.51 at the close of 2021. This 3.8% decline contrasts with the preceding 21.6% annual growth of the segment from 2020 to 2021.
Mattress sales in 2022 appear to be lost to other home furnishings categories as bedding’s percentage of total furniture industry sales also declined from 12.9% in 2021 to 11.8% in 2022. The downward trend continued in 2023, with sales down 3.5% year to date at the close of third quarter, with $13.44 billion in sales compared to $13.93 for the period in 2022.
